The Graph type of a Polyomino

April 14, 2008

This is a continuation of the post radlams.

A graph is some dots (called nodes or vertices) and lines between some of them (called edges). It’s not the geometry of the graph that matters, just how the vertices are connected up by edges.

Associated to each polyomino is a graph, called the graph-type of the polyomino. You get it by putting a vertex at the center of each square and then adding edges between the vertices of adjacent squares:

It turns out (my friend Sean, a graph theorist, pointed this out to me) that whether or not a polyomino is a radlam depends only on its graph type.

Radlams can be pretty easily classified by their graph type. Basically they come in two infinite families. The open ones:

\qquad\qquad\vdots

And the closed ones:

\qquad\qquad\vdots

If you notice, there are no radlams of size p for p=4n+2 except for p=6, in which case we have the single radlam:

Making it unique.

In a subsequent post I will outline a proof of this classification theorem. (by the way, I’m pretty sure that I got all of them in the above lists. If not please let me know).

Entry Filed under: polyominoes. Tags: , , , .

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Chris  |  April 14, 2008 at 6:32 pm

    Ah, radlams. I had almost forgotten. Maybe we can get you in for a guest lecture this summer. When will you be available?

    Reply
  • 2. Proof of radlam Classific&hellip  |  April 24, 2008 at 1:15 pm

    [...] of proof of the classification theorem given in The Graph Type of a Polyomino. (I defined radlams in the post [...]

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


my kind of math

Math is fun and it's for everybody. This blog is about math in real time. None of the stuff on here is "serious math." It's just for fun (as math should be). As far as I know it is all new, so please join in!

Meta

 

April 2008
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Blog Stats

Blogroll